Wpscoop maintains a narrowly focused image-manipulation product, ImageInject, where the durable signal centers on web-application layer vulnerabilities. The recurring weakness classes—cross-site request forgery and cross-site scripting—reflect typical input-handling risks in browser-facing software. Current severity, exploitation, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Wpscoop over time
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (3 CVEs).
3 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2018-5285HIGH The ImageInject plugin 1.15 for WordPress has CSRF via wp-admin/options-general.php. | Jan 8, 2018 | 8.8 | 26 | NO | NO |
CVE-2022-4243MEDIUM The ImageInject WordPress plugin through 1.17 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site S | Dec 26, 2022 | 4.8 | 19 | NO | NO |
CVE-2018-5284MEDIUM The ImageInject plugin 1.15 for WordPress has XSS via the flickr_appid parameter to wp-admin/options-general.php. | Jan 8, 2018 | 4.8 | 17 | NO | NO |
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (3 CVEs).
An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Wpscoop.
Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Wpscoop — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.