Uip
Vendor:
First CVE: Dec 11, 2020 · Active for 5 years
7
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 85% of tracked products
3.5
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 84% of tracked products
8.1
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 74% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Uip over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Dec 11, 2020
5 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Feb 2, 2021
2,002 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Uip7 CVEs
86%
14%
All CVEs353,240 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
HighCritical
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network7 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low7 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None7 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None7 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (7 CVEs).
7 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-17438CRITICAL An issue was discovered in uIP 1.0, as used in Contiki 3.0 and other products. The code that reassembles fragmented packets fails to properly validate the total length of an incomi | Dec 11, 2020 | 9.8 | 37 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-17437HIGH An issue was discovered in uIP 1.0, as used in Contiki 3.0 and other products. When the Urgent flag is set in a TCP packet, and the stack is configured to ignore the urgent data, t | Dec 11, 2020 | 8.2 | 26 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-24334HIGH The code that processes DNS responses in uIP through 1.0, as used in Contiki and Contiki-NG, does not check whether the number of responses specified in the DNS packet header corre | Dec 11, 2020 | 8.2 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-17439HIGH An issue was discovered in uIP 1.0, as used in Contiki 3.0 and other products. The code that parses incoming DNS packets does not validate that the incoming DNS replies match outgo | Dec 11, 2020 | 8.3 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-13987HIGH An issue was discovered in Contiki through 3.0. An Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability exists in the uIP TCP/IP Stack component when calculating the checksums for IP packets in upper_ | Dec 11, 2020 | 7.5 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-24335HIGH An issue was discovered in uIP through 1.0, as used in Contiki and Contiki-NG. Domain name parsing lacks bounds checks, allowing an attacker to corrupt memory with crafted DNS pack | Feb 2, 2021 | 7.5 | 23 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-17440HIGH An issue was discovered in uIP 1.0, as used in Contiki 3.0 and other products. The code that parses incoming DNS packets does not validate that domain names present in the DNS resp | Dec 11, 2020 | 7.5 | 20 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (7 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (7 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (7 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Uip
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 3 | 8.5 | 8.2% | 0 | 0 |