Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Tug

First CVE: Nov 13, 2007Active for: 19 yearsTotal CVEs: 17
21.2
VTI Score
Low

Tug maintains the TeX Live distribution, a widely used typesetting and document-preparation system embedded in academic, publishing, and technical workflows. The vulnerability profile concentrates on memory-safety and input-handling weaknesses—including buffer boundary violations, symlink-following conditions, and command-injection flaws—that reflect the complexity of parsing and processing untrusted document sources. A meaningful share of disclosed vulnerabilities reach serious severity; current exploitation activity and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
17
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 95% of tracked vendors
0.7
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 10% of tracked vendors
6.5
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 41% of tracked vendors
0.0%
In CISA KEV
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Tug over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Nov 13, 2007
18 years ago
Most Recent CVE
May 20, 2023
1,161 days ago

Products(4 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (17 CVEs).

17 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2016-10243CRITICAL
TeX Live allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by leveraging inclusion of mpost in shell_escape_commands in the texmf.cnf config file.
May 2, 20179.834NONO
CVE-2010-2642HIGH
Heap-based buffer overflow in the AFM font parser in the dvi-backend component in Evince 2.32 and earlier, teTeX 3.0, t1lib 5.1.2, and possibly other products allows remote attacke
Jan 7, 20117.631NONO
CVE-2018-17407HIGH
An issue was discovered in t1_check_unusual_charstring functions in writet1.c files in TeX Live before 2018-09-21. A buffer overflow in the handling of Type 1 fonts allows arbitrar
Sep 23, 20187.826NONO
CVE-2023-32700HIGH
LuaTeX before 1.17.0 allows execution of arbitrary shell commands when compiling a TeX file obtained from an untrusted source. This occurs because luatex-core.lua lets the original
May 20, 20237.825NONO
CVE-2017-17513HIGH
TeX Live through 20170524 does not validate strings before launching the program specified by the BROWSER environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to conduct argume
Dec 14, 20178.825NONO
CVE-2010-0827MEDIUM
Integer overflow in dvips in TeX Live 2009 and earlier, and teTeX, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a
May 7, 20106.824NONO
CVE-2010-1440MEDIUM
Multiple integer overflows in dvipsk/dospecial.c in dvips in TeX Live 2009 and earlier, and teTeX, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possib
May 7, 20106.823NONO
CVE-2010-0739MEDIUM
Integer overflow in the predospecial function in dospecial.c in dvips in (1) TeX Live and (2) teTeX might allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a craft
Apr 16, 20106.823NONO
CVE-2023-32668MEDIUM
LuaTeX before 1.17.0 allows a document (compiled with the default settings) to make arbitrary network requests. This occurs because full access to the socket library is permitted b
May 11, 20235.520NONO
CVE-2015-5701MEDIUM
mktexlsr revision 36855, and before revision 36626 as packaged in texlive allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack. NOTE: this vulnerability exists due
Aug 25, 20176.120NONO
View all 17 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products17 CVEs
65%
24%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,294 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
LowMediumHighCritical
Attack Vector
Local6 (35.3%)
Network2 (11.8%)
Unknown9 (52.9%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low7 (41.2%)
High1 (5.9%)
Unknown9 (52.9%)
User Interaction
None3 (17.6%)
Unknown9 (52.9%)
Required5 (29.4%)
Privileges Required
Low2 (11.8%)
High0 (0.0%)
None6 (35.3%)
Unknown9 (52.9%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (17 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Tug.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Tug — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Tug's Products

View all 3 CNAs →

Top CWEs