Tedfelix maintains a narrowly focused vulnerability profile centered on the acpid and acpid2 projects, which handle ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) event processing on Linux systems. The observed weakness classes center on improper input validation in these system-level utilities, reflecting the parsing demands of event-driven hardware communication. Current severity, exploitation activity, and detailed exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Tedfelix over time
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (3 CVEs).
3 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2011-2777MEDIUM samples/powerbtn/powerbtn.sh in acpid (aka acpid2) 2.0.16 and earlier uses the pidof program incorrectly, which allows local users to gain privileges by running a program with the | Aug 29, 2012 | 4.4 | 26 | NO | YES |
acpid.c in acpid before 2.0.9 does not properly handle a situation in which a process has connected to acpid.socket but is not reading any data, which allows local users to cause a | Oct 5, 2011 | 2.1 | 20 | NO | YES |
CVE-2011-4578MEDIUM event.c in acpid (aka acpid2) before 2.0.11 does not have an appropriate umask setting during execution of event-handler scripts, which might allow local users to (1) perform write | Aug 29, 2012 | 4.6 | 17 | NO | NO |
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (3 CVEs).
An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Tedfelix.
Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Tedfelix — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.