Tang
Vendor:
First CVE: Mar 2, 2022 · Active for 4 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 53% of tracked products
1.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Bottom 1%
6.4
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 31% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Tang over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Mar 2, 2022
4 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jul 11, 2023
1,113 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Tang2 CVEs
50%
50%
All CVEs353,240 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network1 (50.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network1 (50.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low1 (50.0%)
High1 (50.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-4076HIGH A flaw exists in tang, a network-based cryptographic binding server, which could result in leak of private keys. | Mar 2, 2022 | 7.5 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2023-1672MEDIUM A race condition exists in the Tang server functionality for key generation and key rotation. This flaw results in a small time window where Tang private keys become readable by ot | Jul 11, 2023 | 5.3 | 19 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Tang
Top CWEs
Versions
No cataloged versions.