Smail
Vendor:
First CVE: Mar 28, 2005 · Active for 21 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 53% of tracked products
2.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 63% of tracked products
8.8
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 80% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Smail over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Mar 28, 2005
21 years ago
Most Recent CVE
May 2, 2005
7,756 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Smail2 CVEs
100%
All CVEs352,785 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
High
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
User Interaction
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2005-0892HIGH Buffer overflow in smail 3.2.0.120 allows remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via a long string in the MAIL FROM command and possibly other SMTP commands. | Mar 28, 2005 | 10.0 | 39 | NO | YES |
CVE-2005-0893HIGH modes.c in smail 3.2.0.120 implements signal handlers with certain unsafe library calls, which may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via signal handler race conditions, pos | May 2, 2005 | 7.6 | 20 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
1 CVE
50.0% of CVEs· 89th percentile
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Smail
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2.0.120 | 2 | 8.8 | 5.4% | 0 | 1 |