Storage Server
Vendor:
First CVE: Apr 9, 2013 · Active for 13 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 49% of tracked products
2.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 60% of tracked products
2.9
Avg CVSS
Bottom 1%
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Storage Server over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Apr 9, 2013
13 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Oct 4, 2013
4,676 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Storage Server2 CVEs
100%
All CVEs352,231 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
Low
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
User Interaction
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown2 (100.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red Hat Storage 2.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the (1) e, (2) local-bricks.list, (3) bricks.err, or (4) limits.conf files in /tmp. | Oct 4, 2013 | 3.6 | 13 | NO | NO |
The GlusterFS functionality in Red Hat Storage Management Console 2.0, Native Client, and Server 2.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on multipl | Apr 9, 2013 | 2.1 | 12 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Storage Server
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 2 | 2.9 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 |