Storage Native Client
Vendor:
First CVE: Apr 9, 2013 · Active for 13 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 49% of tracked products
1.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Bottom 1%
4.3
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 2% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Storage Native Client over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Apr 9, 2013
13 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jun 7, 2016
3,701 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Storage Native Client2 CVEs
50%
50%
All CVEs352,719 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
LowMedium
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network1 (50.0%)
Unknown1 (50.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low1 (50.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown1 (50.0%)
User Interaction
None1 (50.0%)
Unknown1 (50.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low1 (50.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown1 (50.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2014-8177MEDIUM The Red Hat gluster-swift package, as used in Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly Red Hat Storage Server), allows remote authenticated users to bypass the max_meta_count constraint v | Jun 7, 2016 | 6.5 | 18 | NO | NO |
The GlusterFS functionality in Red Hat Storage Management Console 2.0, Native Client, and Server 2.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on multipl | Apr 9, 2013 | 2.1 | 12 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Storage Native Client
Top CWEs
Versions
No cataloged versions.