Linux Powertools

Vendor:

First CVE: Jun 15, 2000 · Active for 26 years

3
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 64% of tracked products
1.5
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 56% of tracked products
7.4
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 49% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Linux Powertools over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Jun 15, 2000
26 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Dec 21, 2001
8,981 days ago

CVE Severity & Scoring

Linux Powertools3 CVEs
All CVEs352,294 CVEs
High
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown3 (100.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown3 (100.0%)
User Interaction
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown3 (100.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown3 (100.0%)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

3 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
Format string vulnerability in the default logging callback function _sasl_syslog in common.c in Cyrus SASL library (cyrus-sasl) may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary com
Dec 21, 20017.520NONO
The DocumentTemplate package in Zope 2.2 and earlier allows a remote attacker to modify DTMLDocuments or DTMLMethods without authorization.
Jun 15, 20007.520NONO
Zope before 2.2.4 does not properly compute local roles, which could allow users to bypass specified access restrictions and gain privileges.
Mar 12, 20017.218NONO

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Media Mentions

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Linux Powertools

Versions

VersionCVE CountAvg CVSSAvg EPSSKEVExploits
7.017.20.4%00
6.237.42.1%00
6.127.31.7%00