Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller

Vendor:

First CVE: Jun 19, 2019 · Active for 7 years

2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 49% of tracked products
2.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 60% of tracked products
7.5
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 50% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Jun 19, 2019
7 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jun 19, 2019
2,594 days ago

CVE Severity & Scoring

Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller2 CVEs
All CVEs352,719 CVEs
High
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low2 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).

2 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs).
Jun 19, 20197.578NONO
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgme
Jun 19, 20197.576NONO

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).

Media Mentions

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller

Top CWEs

Versions

No cataloged versions.