Bubblewrap

Vendor:

First CVE: Mar 29, 2017 · Active for 9 years

3
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 64% of tracked products
1.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Bottom 1%
8.5
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 76% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Bubblewrap over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Mar 29, 2017
9 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Mar 31, 2020
2,306 days ago

CVE Severity & Scoring

Bubblewrap3 CVEs
All CVEs352,294 CVEs
HighCritical
Attack Vector
Local2 (66.7%)
Network1 (33.3%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low3 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None3 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low2 (66.7%)
High0 (0.0%)
None1 (33.3%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

3 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
When executing a program via the bubblewrap sandbox, the nonpriv session can escape to the parent session by using the TIOCSTI ioctl to push characters into the terminal's input bu
Mar 29, 201710.033NONO
Bubblewrap (bwrap) before version 0.4.1, if installed in setuid mode and the kernel supports unprivileged user namespaces, then the `bwrap --userns2` option can be used to make the
Mar 31, 20207.825NONO
bubblewrap.c in Bubblewrap before 0.3.3 misuses temporary directories in /tmp as a mount point. In some particular configurations (related to XDG_RUNTIME_DIR), a local attacker may
May 29, 20197.824NONO

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Media Mentions

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Bubblewrap

Top CWEs

Versions

No cataloged versions.