Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Pingtel

First CVE: Jul 23, 2002Active for: 24 yearsTotal CVEs: 12
22.1
VTI Score
Low

Pingtel's vulnerability profile centers on its Xpressa unified communications appliance and related firmware, a narrowly scoped product line serving enterprise voice and messaging deployments. The recurring exposure involves code-integrity and download-validation weaknesses, reflecting the risks inherent to firmware update mechanisms and embedded system trust chains. Current severity, exploitation activity, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
12
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 93% of tracked vendors
2.0
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 80% of tracked vendors
6.3
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 37% of tracked vendors
0.0%
In CISA KEV
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Pingtel over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Jul 23, 2002
24 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Sep 13, 2004
7,984 days ago

Products(2 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (12 CVEs).

12 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2002-0667HIGH
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 has a default null administrator password, which could allow remote attackers to gain access to the phone.
Jul 23, 200210.031NONO
CVE-2002-0671CRITICAL
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 downloads phone applications from a web site but can not verify the integrity of the applications, which could a
Jul 23, 20029.829NONO
CVE-2002-0674HIGH
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 does not "time out" an inactive administrator session, which could allow other users to perform administrator ac
Jul 23, 20027.223NONO
CVE-2002-0668HIGH
The web interface for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows authenticated users to modify the Call Forwarding settings and hijack calls.
Jul 23, 20027.519NONO
CVE-2002-0670HIGH
The web interface for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 uses Base64 encoded usernames and passwords for HTTP basic authentication, which allows re
Jul 23, 20027.519NONO
CVE-2002-0673MEDIUM
The enrollment process for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows attackers with physical access to the phone to log out the current user and re
Jul 23, 20024.618NONO
CVE-2002-0675MEDIUM
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 does not require administrative privileges to perform a firmware upgrade, which allows unauthorized users to upg
Jul 23, 20024.618NONO
CVE-2004-1680MEDIUM
application.cgi in the Pingtel Xpressa handset running firmware 2.1.11.24 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (VxWorks OS crash) via a long HTTP GET requ
Sep 13, 20045.015NONO
CVE-2002-0669MEDIUM
The web interface for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows administrators to cause a denial of service by modifying the SIP_AUTHENTICATE_SCHEM
Feb 19, 20035.015NONO
CVE-2002-1934MEDIUM
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 2.0.1 leaks sensitive information during boot-up, which allows attackers to obtain the MD5 hash of the Admin password, M
Dec 31, 20025.015NONO
View all 12 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products12 CVEs
58%
33%
8%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,231 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHighCritical
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network1 (8.3%)
Unknown11 (91.7%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low1 (8.3%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown11 (91.7%)
User Interaction
None1 (8.3%)
Unknown11 (91.7%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None1 (8.3%)
Unknown11 (91.7%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (12 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Pingtel.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Pingtel — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Pingtel's Products

View all 1 CNAs →

Top CWEs