Tuxedo
Vendor:
First CVE: Feb 15, 2016 · Active for 10 years
16
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 93% of tracked products
2.7
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 78% of tracked products
7.5
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 52% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Tuxedo over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Feb 15, 2016
10 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jan 18, 2022
1,652 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Tuxedo16 CVEs
38%
44%
19%
All CVEs353,240 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHighCritical
Attack Vector
Local1 (6.3%)
Network14 (87.5%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network1 (6.3%)
Attack Complexity
Low9 (56.3%)
High7 (43.8%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None15 (93.8%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required1 (6.3%)
Privileges Required
Low5 (31.3%)
High0 (0.0%)
None11 (68.8%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (16 CVEs).
16 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-0227HIGH A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projec | May 1, 2019 | 7.5 | 84 | NO | YES |
CVE-2021-4104HIGH JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName | Dec 14, 2021 | 7.5 | 70 | NO | NO |
CVE-2022-23305CRITICAL By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message conv | Jan 18, 2022 | 9.8 | 68 | NO | NO |
CVE-2022-23302HIGH JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration refere | Jan 18, 2022 | 8.8 | 63 | NO | NO |
CVE-2022-23307HIGH CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exi | Jan 18, 2022 | 8.8 | 57 | NO | NO |
CVE-2017-10269CRITICAL Vulnerability in the Oracle Tuxedo component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 11.1.1, 12.1.1, 12.1.3 and 12.2.2. Easily ex | Nov 14, 2017 | 10.0 | 31 | NO | NO |
CVE-2018-5407MEDIUM Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. | Nov 15, 2018 | 4.7 | 29 | NO | YES |
CVE-2018-0734MEDIUM The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the privat | Oct 30, 2018 | 5.9 | 26 | NO | NO |
CVE-2018-8032MEDIUM Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. | Aug 2, 2018 | 6.1 | 26 | NO | NO |
CVE-2018-3007HIGH Vulnerability in the Oracle Tuxedo component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1, 12.1.3 and 12.2.2. Easily exploitabl | Jul 18, 2018 | 8.6 | 24 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (16 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
2 CVEs
12.5% of CVEs· 86th percentile
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (16 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (16 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Tuxedo
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.2.2.0.0 | 4 | 8.7 | 65.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 12.2.2 | 6 | 8.1 | 1.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 12.1.3 | 8 | 7.7 | 14.0% | 0 | 1 |
| 12.1.1.0.0 | 5 | 6.0 | 24.6% | 0 | 2 |
| 12.1.1.0 | 1 | 5.9 | 10.7% | 0 | 0 |
| 12.1.1 | 6 | 8.1 | 1.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 11.1.1 | 5 | 7.9 | 1.4% | 0 | 0 |