Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Octopus Deploy

First CVE: Jul 17, 2017Active for: 9 yearsTotal CVEs: 103
30.3
VTI Score
Low

Octopus Deploy is a modestly represented vendor in the vulnerability landscape, yet among the most prominent in the deployment-automation and release-management space, where its server, agent, and communication components sit in privileged positions across CI/CD pipelines and production environments. Vulnerabilities affecting the vendor lean toward moderate severity outcomes and concentrate in its flagship Octopus Server product and its Tentacle agent framework, recurrent across weakness classes including sensitive-information logging and storage, cross-site scripting in web interfaces, and improper privilege management in orchestration contexts. The exposure reflects the sensitive nature of deployment systems: they routinely handle credentials, secrets, and configuration data that flow between development and production, and they execute privileged operations across infrastructure. Defenders should treat Octopus Deploy advisories as high-priority for inventory and patch cycles, particularly where instances are internet-facing or handle high-value deployment credentials; live severity, exploitation, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
103
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 99% of tracked vendors
1.7
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 79% of tracked vendors
6.4
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 38% of tracked vendors
0.0%
In CISA KEV
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Octopus Deploy over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Jul 17, 2017
9 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jun 19, 2026
35 days ago

Self-Reporting Analysis

Of all the CVEs published by Octopus Deploy as a CNA, 98.5% affect products that Octopus Deploy develops as a vendor.

98.5%
Self-reported: 66 (98.5%)
Third-party: 1 (1.5%)

Of all the CVEs published that affect products developed by Octopus Deploy, 64.1% are self-published by Octopus Deploy as a CNA.

64.1%
35.9%
Self-published: 66 (64.1%)
Other CNAs: 37 (35.9%)

Products(6 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (103 CVEs).

103 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2018-18850HIGH
In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment processes could upload a maliciously crafted YAML configurat
Oct 31, 20188.844NOYES
CVE-2022-2572CRITICAL
In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still v
Nov 1, 20229.830NONO
CVE-2022-2778CRITICAL
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes.
Sep 30, 20229.830NONO
CVE-2021-31819CRITICAL
In Halibut versions prior to 4.4.7 there is a deserialisation vulnerability that could allow remote code execution on systems that already trust each other based on certificate ver
Sep 22, 20219.830NONO
CVE-2026-0704CRITICAL
In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentiall
Feb 25, 20269.129NONO
CVE-2024-9194CRITICAL
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Inject
Sep 30, 20249.829NONO
CVE-2018-11320CRITICAL
In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive values obfuscated in the deployment logs.
May 21, 20189.829NONO
CVE-2022-2782CRITICAL
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters.
Oct 27, 20229.128NONO
CVE-2026-4881MEDIUM
In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpo
Jun 4, 20266.527NONO
CVE-2022-4009HIGH
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation
Mar 16, 20238.827NONO
View all 103 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products103 CVEs
57%
32%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,231 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
LowMediumHighCritical
Attack Vector
Local6 (5.8%)
Network97 (94.2%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low96 (93.2%)
High7 (6.8%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None85 (82.5%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required17 (16.5%)
Privileges Required
Low52 (50.5%)
High5 (4.9%)
None46 (44.7%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (103 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
1 CVE
1.0% of CVEs· 97th percentile
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Octopus Deploy.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Octopus Deploy — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Octopus Deploy's Products

View all 3 CNAs →

Top CWEs