Microchip Technology's vulnerability footprint spans a moderately sized but prominent portfolio of embedded networking and synchronization devices, including wireless modules, time-distribution appliances, and network synchronization servers that are widely deployed in critical infrastructure and enterprise environments. Vulnerabilities affecting the vendor skew toward serious outcomes, with an elevated share reaching critical severity and a frequent tendency toward public exploit availability, reflecting the network-exposed nature and real-time control role of these appliances. The exposure recurs across products such as the TimeProvider 4100 platform and RN4870 wireless modules through weakness classes including path traversal, cross-site scripting, classic buffer overflows, and OS command injection that are typical of embedded web interfaces and command-line tooling. Defenders should treat Microchip device firmware as a high-priority patching target, particularly for internet-reachable instances; current severity, exploitation, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Microchip Technology over time
Of all the CVEs published by Microchip Technology as a CNA, 78.3% affect products that Microchip Technology develops as a vendor.
Of all the CVEs published that affect products developed by Microchip Technology, 34.0% are self-published by Microchip Technology as a CNA.
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (53 CVEs).
53 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-40022CRITICAL Microchip Technology (Microsemi) SyncServer S650 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability. | Feb 13, 2023 | 9.8 | 90 | NO | YES |
CVE-2024-9054HIGH Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Microchip Ti | Oct 4, 2024 | 8.8 | 43 | NO | YES |
CVE-2009-1608HIGH Multiple buffer overflows in Microchip MPLAB IDE 8.30 and possibly earlier versions allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .MCP project file with long | May 11, 2009 | 9.3 | 38 | NO | YES |
CVE-2009-1674HIGH Stack-based buffer overflow in Microchip MPLAB IDE 8.30 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long .cof pathname in a [TOOL_SETTINGS] section in a . | May 18, 2009 | 9.3 | 34 | NO | YES |
CVE-2024-7490CRITICAL Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Microchip Techology Advanced Software Framework example DHCP server can cause remote code execution through a buffer overflow.
This vuln | Aug 8, 2024 | 9.8 | 32 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-17441CRITICAL An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payloa | Dec 11, 2020 | 9.1 | 31 | NO | NO |
CVE-2024-43685CRITICAL Improper Authentication vulnerability in Microchip TimeProvider 4100 (login modules) allows Session Hijacking.This issue affects TimeProvider 4100: from 1.0 before 2.4.7. | Oct 4, 2024 | 9.8 | 30 | NO | NO |
CVE-2025-47901HIGH Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Microchip Time Provider 4100 allows OS Command Injection.This issue affe | Oct 20, 2025 | 8.8 | 29 | NO | NO |
CVE-2025-47900HIGH Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Microchip Time Provider 4100 allows OS Command Injection.This issue affe | Oct 20, 2025 | 8.8 | 29 | NO | NO |
CVE-2019-16127CRITICAL Atmel Advanced Software Framework (ASF) 4 has an Integer Overflow. | Oct 22, 2020 | 9.1 | 29 | NO | NO |
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (53 CVEs).
An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Microchip Technology.
Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Microchip Technology — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.