Mt8666b

Vendor:

First CVE: Mar 4, 2024 · Active for 2 years

3
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 64% of tracked products
3.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 76% of tracked products
7.0
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 40% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Mt8666b over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Mar 4, 2024
2 years ago
Most Recent CVE
May 6, 2024
810 days ago

CVE Severity & Scoring

Mt8666b3 CVEs
All CVEs352,427 CVEs
MediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local3 (100.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low3 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None3 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High3 (100.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

3 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
In da, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User inter
Mar 4, 20248.222NONO
In atf spm, there is a possible way to remap physical memory to virtual memory due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileg
May 6, 20246.720NONO
In flashc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to lack of valudation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interac
Mar 4, 20246.016NONO

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Media Mentions

Signals from CVEs in this product scope (3 CVEs).

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Mt8666b

Top CWEs

Versions

No cataloged versions.