Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Ietf

First CVE: Apr 25, 2007Active for: 19 yearsTotal CVEs: 16
44.8
VTI Score
High

The Internet Engineering Task Force maintains a body of standards spanning network protocols and cryptographic specifications such as IPv6, 802.1Q, PKCS#1, and Generic Routing Encapsulation, which are foundational to internet infrastructure and widely embedded across operating systems, networking equipment, and security applications. Vulnerabilities identified in IETF standards and protocol implementations recur through authentication-bypass and spoofing flaws, cryptographic weaknesses, and improper handling of length parameters, and such issues frequently acquire public exploit code. Defenders should treat protocol-level flaws in this portfolio as high-impact: remediation often requires coordinated updates across a broad ecosystem of vendors and devices rather than single-point patches, and the widespread embedding of these standards amplifies the consequence of each disclosure; live severity and exploitation figures are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
16
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 95% of tracked vendors
0.2
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 1% of tracked vendors
6.5
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 41% of tracked vendors
6.3%
In CISA KEV
Higher KEV Rate than 100% of tracked vendors

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Ietf over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Apr 25, 2007
19 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Feb 5, 2025
534 days ago

Products(11 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (16 CVEs).

16 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2023-44487HIGH
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through
Oct 10, 20237.597YESYES
CVE-2004-2761CRITICAL
The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the us
Jan 5, 20099.842NOYES
CVE-2016-10142HIGH
An issue was discovered in the IPv6 protocol specification, related to ICMP Packet Too Big (PTB) messages. (The scope of this CVE is all affected IPv6 implementations from all vend
Jan 14, 20178.631NONO
CVE-2015-8960HIGH
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the a
Sep 21, 20168.127NONO
CVE-2018-5389MEDIUM
The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross
Sep 6, 20185.923NONO
CVE-2020-20949MEDIUM
Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 padding for RSA in STM32 cryptographic firmware library software expansion for STM32Cube (UM1924). The vulnerability can allow one to use Bl
Jan 20, 20215.922NONO
CVE-2020-20950MEDIUM
Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 padding for RSA in Microchip Libraries for Applications 2018-11-26 All up to 2018-11-26. The vulnerability can allow one to use Bleichenbach
Jan 19, 20215.922NONO
CVE-2025-23019MEDIUM
IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling (RFC 4213) allows an attacker to spoof and route traffic via an exposed network interface.
Jan 14, 20256.521NONO
CVE-2025-23018MEDIUM
IPv4-in-IPv6 and IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling (RFC 2473) do not require the validation or verification of the source of a network packet, allowing an attacker to spoof and route arbitrar
Jan 14, 20256.521NONO
CVE-2007-2242HIGH
The IPv6 protocol allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted IPv6 type 0 route headers (IPV6_RTHDR_TYPE_0) that create network amplification between two route
Apr 25, 20077.821NONO
View all 16 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products16 CVEs
69%
25%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,294 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHighCritical
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network11 (68.8%)
Unknown1 (6.3%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network4 (25.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low7 (43.8%)
High8 (50.0%)
Unknown1 (6.3%)
User Interaction
None15 (93.8%)
Unknown1 (6.3%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None15 (93.8%)
Unknown1 (6.3%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (16 CVEs).

CISA KEV
1 CVE
6.2% of CVEs· 100th percentile
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
2 CVEs
12.5% of CVEs· 76th percentile

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Ietf.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Ietf — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Ietf's Products

View all 3 CNAs →

Top CWEs