Infosphere Guardium
Vendor:
First CVE: Aug 29, 2012 · Active for 13 years
9
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 88% of tracked products
3.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 78% of tracked products
6.0
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 23% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Infosphere Guardium over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Aug 29, 2012
13 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Sep 1, 2020
2,156 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Infosphere Guardium9 CVEs
78%
22%
All CVEs353,240 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local1 (11.1%)
Network5 (55.6%)
Unknown3 (33.3%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low6 (66.7%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown3 (33.3%)
User Interaction
None5 (55.6%)
Unknown3 (33.3%)
Required1 (11.1%)
Privileges Required
Low4 (44.4%)
High0 (0.0%)
None2 (22.2%)
Unknown3 (33.3%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (9 CVEs).
9 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2012-3336HIGH IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote authenticated attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements to multiple scripts, which co | Sep 1, 2020 | 8.8 | 27 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3309MEDIUM Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the account-creation panel in IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.2 and earlier, when the CSRF filtering (aka csrf_status) feature is disab | Aug 29, 2012 | 6.8 | 23 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3341MEDIUM IBM InfoSphere Guardium 7.0, 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vu | Sep 1, 2020 | 5.4 | 20 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3338MEDIUM IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper restrictions on the create new user account functionali | Sep 1, 2020 | 5.3 | 20 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-2204MEDIUM InfoSphere Guardium aix_ktap module: DoS | Feb 10, 2020 | 5.5 | 20 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3337MEDIUM IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing &q | Sep 1, 2020 | 5.3 | 19 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3312MEDIUM The datasource definition editor in IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.2 and earlier, when the save-password setting is enabled, transmits cleartext database credentials, which allows remot | Aug 29, 2012 | 5.0 | 19 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-3340MEDIUM IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to XML external entity injection, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote authenticated attacker cou | Sep 1, 2020 | 4.3 | 18 | NO | NO |
CVE-2013-0490HIGH Unspecified vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Guardium S-TAP 8.1 for DB2 on z/OS allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. | Feb 27, 2013 | 7.2 | 18 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (9 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (9 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (9 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Infosphere Guardium
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.2.0 | 1 | 5.5 | 0.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.2 | 5 | 5.8 | 1.2% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.0.1 | 2 | 4.8 | 0.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.01 | 5 | 6.2 | 1.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.0.0 | 1 | 5.5 | 0.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.00 | 3 | 6.3 | 1.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 8.0 | 5 | 5.8 | 1.2% | 0 | 0 |
| 7.00 | 1 | 5.4 | 0.7% | 0 | 0 |