Connect
Vendor:
First CVE: Aug 24, 2020 · Active for 5 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 49% of tracked products
2.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 60% of tracked products
8.8
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 79% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Connect over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Aug 24, 2020
5 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Dec 15, 2020
2,047 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Connect2 CVEs
50%
50%
All CVEs352,294 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
HighCritical
Attack Vector
Local1 (50.0%)
Network1 (50.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low2 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low1 (50.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None1 (50.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-4747CRITICAL IBM Connect:Direct for UNIX 6.1.0, 6.0.0, 4.3.0, and 4.2.0 can allow a local or remote user to obtain an authenticated CLI session due to improper authentication methods. IBM X-For | Dec 15, 2020 | 9.8 | 24 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-4587HIGH IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to a stack based buffer ovreflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local attacker could manip | Aug 24, 2020 | 7.8 | 20 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Connect
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| direct | 2 | 9.1 | 1.5% | 0 | 0 |