Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Glyphandcog

First CVE: Dec 15, 2007Active for: 19 yearsTotal CVEs: 58
35.1
VTI Score
Medium

Glyphandcog maintains a focused portfolio of PDF processing utilities—including Xpdf, Xpdfreader, and pdftops—that are embedded across numerous document-handling workflows and command-line environments despite their narrow vendor footprint. The vulnerability landscape for this vendor is shaped by the structural complexity of PDF parsing: recurring weaknesses center on memory-safety issues such as out-of-bounds reads, buffer-boundary violations, integer overflows, and NULL-pointer dereferences, along with improper input validation against malformed or adversarial PDF structures. These weakness classes are characteristic of C-based parsers operating on untrusted binary formats, where a single crafted document can trigger memory corruption or denial-of-service conditions. Defenders relying on these utilities should monitor for updates and treat PDF processing as a potential attack vector, particularly in automated or network-exposed contexts. Current severity, exploitation, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
56
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 99% of tracked vendors
2.7
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 97% of tracked vendors
6.4
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 39% of tracked vendors
0.0%
In CISA KEV
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Glyphandcog over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Dec 15, 2007
18 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Nov 10, 2022
1,355 days ago

Products(2 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (56 CVEs).

56 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2009-3603HIGH
Integer overflow in the SplashBitmap::SplashBitmap function in Xpdf 3.x before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafte
Oct 21, 20099.333NONO
CVE-2009-3608HIGH
Integer overflow in the ObjectStream::ObjectStream function in XRef.cc in Xpdf 3.x before 3.02pl4 and Poppler before 0.12.1, as used in GPdf, kdegraphics KPDF, CUPS pdftops, and te
Oct 21, 20099.332NONO
CVE-2009-3604HIGH
The Splash::drawImage function in Splash.cc in Xpdf 2.x and 3.x before 3.02pl4, and Poppler 0.x, as used in GPdf and kdegraphics KPDF, does not properly allocate memory, which allo
Oct 21, 20099.332NONO
CVE-2009-3606HIGH
Integer overflow in the PSOutputDev::doImageL1Sep function in Xpdf before 3.02pl4, and Poppler 0.x, as used in kdegraphics KPDF, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary c
Oct 21, 20099.331NONO
CVE-2011-0764MEDIUM
t1lib 5.1.2 and earlier, as used in Xpdf before 3.02pl6, teTeX, and other products, uses an invalid pointer in conjunction with a dereference operation, which allows remote attacke
Mar 31, 20116.827NONO
CVE-2021-40226HIGH
xpdfreader 4.03 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.
Nov 10, 20227.525NONO
CVE-2022-24106HIGH
In Xpdf prior to 4.04, the DCT (JPEG) decoder was incorrectly allowing the 'interleaved' flag to be changed after the first scan of the image, leading to an unknown integer-related
Aug 30, 20227.825NONO
CVE-2019-13289HIGH
In Xpdf 4.01.01, there is a use-after-free vulnerability in the function JBIG2Stream::close() located at JBIG2Stream.cc. It can, for example, be triggered by sending a crafted PDF
Jul 4, 20197.825NONO
CVE-2019-13283HIGH
In Xpdf 4.01.01, a heap-based buffer over-read could be triggered in strncpy from FoFiType1::parse in fofi/FoFiType1.cc because it does not ensure the source string has a valid len
Jul 4, 20197.825NONO
CVE-2019-13281HIGH
In Xpdf 4.01.01, a heap-based buffer overflow could be triggered in DCTStream::decodeImage() in Stream.cc when writing to frameBuf memory. It can, for example, be triggered by send
Jul 4, 20197.825NONO
View all 56 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products56 CVEs
61%
39%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,785 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local30 (53.6%)
Network2 (3.6%)
Unknown24 (42.9%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low32 (57.1%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown24 (42.9%)
User Interaction
None2 (3.6%)
Unknown24 (42.9%)
Required30 (53.6%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None32 (57.1%)
Unknown24 (42.9%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (56 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Glyphandcog.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Glyphandcog — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Glyphandcog's Products

View all 3 CNAs →

Top CWEs