Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

Ethereal Group

First CVE: May 31, 1999Active for: 27 yearsTotal CVEs: 105
46.8
VTI Score
High

Ethereal Group maintains a narrowly scoped product portfolio centered on the Ethereal application, which despite its limited product surface commands prominence in the vulnerability landscape, likely reflecting deep integration or widespread deployment in critical infrastructure or security tooling. The vulnerability exposure recurs through a mix of memory-safety and input-handling weakness classes, including buffer-boundary violations, improper input validation, and format-string flaws that are characteristic of legacy or performance-sensitive codebases. A moderate share of the vendor's disclosures have acquired public exploit code, consistent with the appeal of such flaws to researchers and tool developers. The concentration of high-prevalence CVEs within a single product underscores the importance of maintaining vigilant patch cycles for this widely trusted component. Current severity, exploitation activity, and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.

FAUCET AI Generated
105
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 99% of tracked vendors
11.7
Avg CVEs / Product / Year
More Avg CVEs / Product / Year than 100% of tracked vendors
6.0
Avg CVSS Score
Higher Avg CVSS Score than 29% of tracked vendors
0.0%
In CISA KEV
Bottom 1%

Trends Over Time

The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Ethereal Group over time

Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
May 31, 1999
27 years ago
Most Recent CVE
May 12, 2010
5,917 days ago

Products(1 total)

Top CVEs

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (105 CVEs).

105 CVEs · Highest risk first

CVEPublishedCVSSRiskKEVExploit
CVE-2004-0176MEDIUM
Multiple buffer overflows in Ethereal 0.8.13 to 0.10.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via the (1) NetFlow, (2) IGAP, (3) EI
May 4, 20045.058NOYES
CVE-2005-3243HIGH
Multiple buffer overflows in Ethereal 0.10.12 and earlier might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors in the (1) SLIMP3 and (2) AgentX dissector.
Oct 27, 20057.533NOYES
CVE-2005-1461HIGH
Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) SIP, (2) CMIP, (3) CMP, (4) CMS, (5) CRMF, (6) ESS, (7) OCSP, (8) X.509, (9) ISIS, (10) DISTCC, (11) FCELS, (12) Q.931, (13) NCP, (14) TCAP, (1
May 5, 20057.531NOYES
CVE-2005-2367HIGH
Format string vulnerability in the proto_item_set_text function in Ethereal 0.9.4 through 0.10.11, as used in multiple dissectors, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary mem
Aug 10, 20057.530NOYES
CVE-2004-0633MEDIUM
The iSNS dissector for Ethereal 0.10.3 through 0.10.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process abort) via an integer overflow.
Dec 6, 20045.030NOYES
CVE-2003-0431HIGH
The tvb_get_nstringz0 function in Ethereal 0.9.12 and earlier does not properly handle a zero-length buffer size, with unknown consequences.
Jul 24, 200310.030NONO
CVE-2000-1174HIGH
Multiple buffer overflows in AFS ACL parser for Ethereal 0.8.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a packet with a long username.
Jan 9, 20017.530NOYES
CVE-2006-3628HIGH
Multiple format string vulnerabilities in Wireshark (aka Ethereal) 0.10.x to 0.99.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via the
Jul 21, 200610.027NONO
CVE-2006-3632HIGH
Buffer overflow in Wireshark (aka Ethereal) 0.8.16 to 0.99.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via the NFS dissector.
Jul 21, 200610.027NONO
CVE-2005-3184HIGH
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the unicode_to_bytes in the Service Location Protocol (srvloc) dissector (packet-srvloc.c) in Ethereal allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary
Oct 20, 200510.027NONO
View all 105 CVEs →

CVE Severity & Scoring

Severity distribution of CVEs that affect this vendor's products105 CVEs
69%
31%
Severity distribution among all CVEs352,294 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
MediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown105 (100.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown105 (100.0%)
User Interaction
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown105 (100.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown105 (100.0%)

Exploit Exposure

Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (105 CVEs).

CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
9 CVEs
8.6% of CVEs· 76th percentile

Social Chatter

An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Ethereal Group.

Media Mentions

Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Ethereal Group — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.

Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Ethereal Group's Products

View all 3 CNAs →

Top CWEs