Dropbear SSH is a lightweight SSH server and client widely deployed in embedded systems, IoT devices, and resource-constrained environments where its small footprint and low memory overhead are essential. Although the vendor maintains a narrow product portfolio, Dropbear's presence in countless embedded appliances, routers, and industrial devices gives it a prominent position in the vulnerability landscape. Vulnerabilities affecting Dropbear skew toward a meaningful share of serious outcomes and frequently acquire public exploit code, reflecting the security-critical nature of SSH and the accessibility of many affected devices. The recurring exposure centers on authentication weaknesses, input-validation flaws, and memory-management issues such as double-free conditions that are characteristic of C-based network daemons operating in constrained environments. Defenders should prioritize Dropbear inventory across embedded infrastructure and ensure timely patching, as widespread deployment in legacy and hard-to-update devices compounds the risk; current exploitation activity and exposure counts are shown alongside this summary.
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact products developed by Dropbear Ssh Project over time
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (21 CVEs).
21 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-48795MEDIUM The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packet | Dec 18, 2023 | 5.9 | 81 | NO | YES |
CVE-2016-3116MEDIUM CRLF injection vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.72 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended shell-command restrictions via crafted X11 forwarding data. | Mar 22, 2016 | 6.4 | 43 | NO | YES |
CVE-2006-1206MEDIUM Matt Johnston Dropbear SSH server 0.47 and earlier, as used in embedded Linux devices and on general-purpose operating systems, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service | Mar 14, 2006 | 5.0 | 34 | NO | YES |
CVE-2016-7406CRITICAL Format string vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) username or (2) host argument. | Mar 3, 2017 | 9.8 | 32 | NO | NO |
CVE-2017-9078HIGH The server in Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow post-authentication root remote code execution because of a double free in cleanup of TCP listeners when the -a option is enabled. | May 19, 2017 | 8.8 | 31 | NO | NO |
CVE-2016-7408HIGH The dbclient in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) -m or (2) -c argument. | Mar 3, 2017 | 8.8 | 30 | NO | NO |
CVE-2016-7407CRITICAL The dropbearconvert command in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OpenSSH key file. | Mar 3, 2017 | 9.8 | 28 | NO | NO |
CVE-2021-36369HIGH An issue was discovered in Dropbear through 2020.81. Due to a non-RFC-compliant check of the available authentication methods in the client-side SSH code, it is possible for an SSH | Oct 12, 2022 | 7.5 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2020-36254HIGH scp.c in Dropbear before 2020.79 mishandles the filename of . or an empty filename, a related issue to CVE-2018-20685. | Feb 25, 2021 | 8.1 | 25 | NO | NO |
CVE-2012-0920HIGH Use-after-free vulnerability in Dropbear SSH Server 0.52 through 2012.54, when command restriction and public key authentication are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to e | Jun 5, 2012 | 7.1 | 25 | NO | NO |
Signals from CVEs in this vendor scope (21 CVEs).
An overview of all social media posts that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Dropbear Ssh Project.
Media articles that mention a CVE ID that affects a product developed by Dropbear Ssh Project — matched by CVE ID, not by vendor name.