Doas
Vendor:
First CVE: Oct 18, 2019 · Active for 6 years
2
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 53% of tracked products
2.0
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 63% of tracked products
9.3
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 86% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Doas over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Oct 18, 2019
6 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Oct 18, 2019
2,474 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Doas2 CVEs
50%
50%
All CVEs352,785 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
HighCritical
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low2 (100.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
User Interaction
None2 (100.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low1 (50.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None1 (50.0%)
Unknown0 (0.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
2 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-15900CRITICAL An issue was discovered in slicer69 doas before 6.2 on certain platforms other than OpenBSD. On platforms without strtonum(3), sscanf was used without checking for error cases. Ins | Oct 18, 2019 | 9.8 | 29 | NO | NO |
CVE-2019-15901HIGH An issue was discovered in slicer69 doas before 6.2 on certain platforms other than OpenBSD. A setusercontext(3) call with flags to change the UID, primary GID, and secondary GIDs | Oct 18, 2019 | 8.8 | 27 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (2 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Doas
Top CWEs
Versions
No cataloged versions.