Geronimo
Vendor:
First CVE: Jan 18, 2006 · Active for 20 years
11
Total CVEs
More Total CVEs than 89% of tracked products
1.6
Avg CVEs / Year
Higher CVE frequency than 59% of tracked products
6.8
Avg CVSS
Higher Avg CVSS than 36% of tracked products
0.0%
KEV Rate
Bottom 1%
Trends Over Time
The number and severity of CVEs published that impact Geronimo over time
Volume of CVEsAvg CVSS Base Score
First CVE
Jan 18, 2006
20 years ago
Most Recent CVE
Jul 11, 2013
4,761 days ago
CVE Severity & Scoring
Geronimo11 CVEs
9%
36%
55%
All CVEs352,231 CVEs
45%
40%
11%
LowMediumHigh
Attack Vector
Local0 (0.0%)
Network0 (0.0%)
Unknown11 (100.0%)
Physical0 (0.0%)
Adjacent Network0 (0.0%)
Attack Complexity
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
Unknown11 (100.0%)
User Interaction
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown11 (100.0%)
Required0 (0.0%)
Privileges Required
Low0 (0.0%)
High0 (0.0%)
None0 (0.0%)
Unknown11 (100.0%)
Top CVEs
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (11 CVEs).
11 CVEs · Highest risk first
| CVE | Published | CVSS | Risk | KEV | Exploit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2011-5034HIGH Apache Geronimo 2.2.1 and earlier computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to | Dec 30, 2011 | 7.8 | 83 | NO | YES |
CVE-2008-5518HIGH Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 on Windows allow remote attackers to upload f | Apr 17, 2009 | 9.4 | 53 | NO | YES |
CVE-2006-0254MEDIUM Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Geronimo 1.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) time parameter to cal2.jsp and | Jan 18, 2006 | 4.3 | 36 | NO | YES |
CVE-2010-1632HIGH Apache Axis2 before 1.5.2, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 through 7.0.0.12, IBM Feature Pack for Web Services 6.1.0.9 through 6.1.0.32, IBM Feature Pack for | Jun 22, 2010 | 7.5 | 34 | NO | NO |
CVE-2009-0039MEDIUM Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to hijac | Apr 17, 2009 | 6.8 | 31 | NO | YES |
CVE-2009-0038MEDIUM Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbit | Apr 17, 2009 | 4.3 | 30 | NO | YES |
CVE-2013-1777HIGH The JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Community Edition 3.0.0.3 and other products, does not properl | Jul 11, 2013 | 10.0 | 28 | NO | NO |
CVE-2007-4548HIGH The login method in LoginModule implementations in Apache Geronimo 2.0 does not throw FailedLoginException for failed logins, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication | Aug 27, 2007 | 10.0 | 26 | NO | NO |
CVE-2007-5797HIGH SQLLoginModule in Apache Geronimo 2.0 through 2.1 does not throw an exception for a nonexistent username, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a login attempt | Nov 3, 2007 | 7.5 | 21 | NO | NO |
CVE-2007-5085MEDIUM Unspecified vulnerability in the management EJB (MEJB) in Apache Geronimo before 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain "access to Geronimo internals" vi | Sep 26, 2007 | 5.0 | 16 | NO | NO |
Exploit Exposure
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (11 CVEs).
CISA KEV
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
Metasploit
1 CVE
9.1% of CVEs· 97th percentile
Nuclei
0 CVEs
0.0% of CVEs· Bottom 1%
ExploitDB
5 CVEs
45.5% of CVEs· 91st percentile
Social Chatter
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (11 CVEs).
Media Mentions
Signals from CVEs in this product scope (11 CVEs).
Top CNAs Publishing CVEs For Geronimo
Top CWEs
Versions
| Version | CVE Count | Avg CVSS | Avg EPSS | KEV | Exploits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | 1 | 10.0 | 9.8% | 0 | 0 |
| 2.2 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.8 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.7 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.6 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.5 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.4 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.1.3 | 4 | 7.1 | 36.5% | 0 | 4 |
| 2.1.2 | 4 | 7.1 | 36.5% | 0 | 4 |
| 2.1.1 | 4 | 7.1 | 36.5% | 0 | 4 |
| 2.1 | 6 | 6.8 | 25.4% | 0 | 4 |
| 2.0.2 | 2 | 7.7 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.0.1 | 3 | 6.8 | 29.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2.0 | 2 | 8.8 | 3.7% | 0 | 0 |
| 1.2 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 1.1.1 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 1.1 | 1 | 7.8 | 81.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 1.0 | 2 | 6.0 | 56.7% | 0 | 2 |