Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

CVE-2026-63996

33
FAUCET Score

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length Malicious SFP module could respond with rpl_len longer than what cmis_cdb_process_reply() expected, leading to OOB writes. Malicious HW is a bit theoretical but some modules may just be buggy and/or the reads may occasionally get corrupted, so let's protect the kernel. The existing check protects from short replies. We need to protect from long ones, too. All callers that pass a non-zero rpl_exp_len cast the reply payload to a fixed-layout struct and read fields at fixed offsets, with no version negotiation or short-reply handling: - cmis_cdb_validate_password() - cmis_cdb_module_features_get() - cmis_fw_update_fw_mng_features_get() so let's assume that responses longer than expected do not have to be handled gracefully here. Add a warning message to make the debug easier in case my understanding is wrong... Note that page_data->length (argument of kmalloc) comes from last arg to ethtool_cmis_page_init() which is rpl_exp_len. Note2 that AIs also like to point out overflows in args->req.payload itself (which is a fixed-size 120 B buffer, on the stack), but callers should be reading structs defined by the standard, so protecting from requests for more data than max seem like defensive programming.

First published: Jul 19, 2026Last modified: Jul 20, 2026

Impacted Technologies

VendorProductVersion(s)CPE
LinuxLinux
6.11CNA affecteddefault affected
LinuxLinux
>= a39c84d796254e6b1662ca0c46dbc313379e9291, < 2f818cc98fd2c63a08239cb48995f6c3bfe9d9b3, >= a39c84d796254e6b1662ca0c46dbc313379e9291, < 4d42fb88ec61f2e98c33a9e3a2de371d5edbc6b1, >= a39c84d796254e6b1662ca0c46dbc313379e9291, < 6c3f999a9d1338c6c89a9ff4549eafe72bc2e7b1, >= a39c84d796254e6b1662ca0c46dbc313379e9291, < eb5dcd740cd7fa27bc2caeff2d28ef28e93ff4d3CNA affecteddefault unaffected

CVSS Data

CVSS version used by this source: 3.1

7.8HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
HIGH
Integrity Impact
HIGH
Availability Impact
HIGH
Exploitability Score
1.8
Impact Score
5.9
CvssVersion
3.1

Exploit Intelligence

EPSS Score
0.13%
Probability of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS Percentile
2.9%
Percentile rank of EPSS score among Peer Group
As of 2026-07-28
Model: v2026.06.15
This CVE's current EPSS score of 0.0013 is in the 14th percentile among its peer group of 17,070 CVEs.

Social Chatter

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 Twitter, 0.1 Reddit, 0.2 Bluesky, 0.1 Mastodon, and 0.2 GitHub mentions.

Media Mentions

No media coverage found for this CVE.

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.3 InfoSec Media, 0.0 Vendor Blog, and 0.0 Security Researcher mentions.

Remediation

Patch Available

Vendor Patches (4)

ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: linux-ibm (resolute)Fixed in: 7.0.0-1010.10
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: linux-oracle (resolute)Fixed in: 7.0.0-1008.8
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: linux-azure (resolute)Fixed in: 7.0.0-1010.10
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: linux-azure-fde (resolute)Fixed in: 7.0.0-1009.9

Vendor Advisories (2)

ubuntuUSN-8603-1

Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities

Jul 24, 2026
ubuntuUSN-8593-1

Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Jul 23, 2026

References

git.kernel.org / stable/c/2f818cc98fd2c63a08239cb48995f6c3bfe9d9b3
git.kernel.org / stable/c/4d42fb88ec61f2e98c33a9e3a2de371d5edbc6b1
git.kernel.org / stable/c/6c3f999a9d1338c6c89a9ff4549eafe72bc2e7b1
git.kernel.org / stable/c/eb5dcd740cd7fa27bc2caeff2d28ef28e93ff4d3