Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

CVE-2026-34182

40
FAUCET Score

Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.

First published: Jun 9, 2026Last modified: Jun 10, 2026

Impacted Technologies

VendorProductVersion(s)CPE
>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.21CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.6CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
>= 3.5.0, < 3.5.7CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
>= 3.6.0, < 3.6.3CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
4.0.0CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:4.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS Data

CVSS version used by this source: 3.1

9.1CRITICAL

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
HIGH
Integrity Impact
HIGH
Availability Impact
NONE
Exploitability Score
3.9
Impact Score
5.2
CvssVersion
3.1

Exploit Intelligence

EPSS Score
0.35%
Probability of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS Percentile
27.6%
Percentile rank of EPSS score among Peer Group
As of 2026-07-27
Model: v2026.06.15
This CVE's current EPSS score of 0.0035 is in the 5th percentile among its peer group of 36,835 CVEs.

Social Chatter

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 Twitter, 0.1 Reddit, 0.3 Bluesky, 0.3 Mastodon, and 2.4 GitHub mentions.

Media Mentions

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.3 InfoSec Media, 0.0 Vendor Blog, and 0.0 Security Researcher mentions.

Remediation

Patch Available

Vendor Patches (14)

github_advisorypatch availablevia nvd_reference
View patch
microsoftpatch availablevia msrc
Product: azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0Fixed in: 3.3.7-2
microsoftpatch availablevia msrc
Product: azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0Fixed in: 20240524git3e722403cd16-18
microsoftpatch availablevia msrc
Product: 21450-17084Fixed in: 20240524git3e722403cd16-18
microsoftpatch availablevia msrc
Product: 21264-17084Fixed in: 3.3.7-2
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (trusty)Fixed in: 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm14
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (xenial)Fixed in: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm16
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (jammy)Fixed in: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.25
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (noble)Fixed in: 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.11
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (questing)Fixed in: 3.5.3-1ubuntu3.4
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (resolute)Fixed in: 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.2
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (bionic)Fixed in: 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm9
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl1.0 (bionic)Fixed in: 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm5
ubuntupatch availablevia ubuntu_usn
Product: openssl (focal)Fixed in: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm4

Vendor Advisories (3)

ubuntuUSN-8414-2

OpenSSL vulnerabilities

Jun 9, 2026
ubuntuUSN-8414-1

OpenSSL vulnerabilities

Jun 9, 2026
microsoft2026-Jun/CVE-2026-34182Critical

CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages

Jun 9, 2026

References

github.com / openssl/openssl/commit/03c1f4d45fb963aee7d5833390c507cd290182bc
Patch
github.com / openssl/openssl/commit/439ed7d2c0962ce964482727264668bf277c333f
Patch
github.com / openssl/openssl/commit/7947e6a81eb8776802f159fb6762cb7fcf7e34c7
Patch
github.com / openssl/openssl/commit/9fd97f8cfdc2c0be214998de3b2b55c8edf6c7ac
Patch
github.com / openssl/openssl/commit/d2ca86bcd43e4f17d899f347101766b6107676e0
Patch
openssl-library.org / news/secadv/20260609.txt
Vendor Advisory