Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

CVE-2025-65501

19
FAUCET Score

CVE-2025-65501 describes a null pointer dereference vulnerability in OISM libcoap 4.3.5, specifically within the coap_dtls_info_callback() function. This flaw allows a remote attacker to trigger a denial of service by initiating a DTLS handshake where SSL_get_app_data() returns NULL. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 4.3 (MEDIUM), indicating a low-impact denial of service that can be triggered remotely with low attack complexity, requiring no privileges or user interaction. While the EPSS score is very low, suggesting a low probability of exploitation, the FAUCET Risk Score is 29/100. Currently, there is no known active exploitation, nor are there publicly available exploit modules in Metasploit, Nuclei, or ExploitDB. The vulnerability has garnered no community discussion or media coverage, which is typical for the vast majority of CVEs.

Impacted Technologies

VendorProductVersion(s)CPE
4.3.5CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:libcoap:libcoap:4.3.5:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS Data

CVSS version used by this source: 3.1

4.3MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
NONE
Integrity Impact
NONE
Availability Impact
LOW
Exploitability Score
2.8
Impact Score
1.4
CvssVersion
3.1

Exploit Intelligence

EPSS Score
0.26%
Probability of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS Percentile
17.5%
Percentile rank of EPSS score among Peer Group
As of 2026-07-27
Model: v2026.06.15
This CVE's current EPSS score of 0.0026 is in the 18th percentile among its peer group of 26,221 CVEs.

Social Chatter

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 Twitter, 0.0 Reddit, 0.1 Bluesky, 0.0 Mastodon, and 0.1 GitHub mentions.

Media Mentions

No media coverage found for this CVE.

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.1 InfoSec Media, 0.0 Vendor Blog, and 0.0 Security Researcher mentions.

Remediation

Remediation records are not available for this CVE.

References

github.com / obgm/libcoap/issues/1748
Issue Tracking
github.com / obgm/libcoap/pull/1750
Issue Tracking