Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

CVE-2013-1428

67
FAUCET Score

CVE-2013-1428 describes a stack-based buffer overflow in the receive_tcppacket function of tinc VPN software versions prior to 1.0.21 and 1.1pre7. This vulnerability allows remote authenticated peers to trigger a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code by sending a large TCP packet. With a CVSS score of 6.5, it is considered a medium-severity issue, requiring authentication but having a low attack complexity. While not actively exploited in the wild, a Metasploit module exists, indicating exploitability, though there is no community discussion or media coverage.

Impacted Technologies

VendorProductVersion(s)CPE
<= 1.0.20CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:tinc-vpn:tinc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
<= 1.1CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:tinc-vpn:tinc:*:pre6:*:*:*:*:*:*
1.0.17CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:tinc-vpn:tinc:1.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
1.0.18CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:tinc-vpn:tinc:1.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
1.0.19CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:tinc-vpn:tinc:1.0.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS Data

CVSS version used by this source: 2.0

6.5MEDIUM

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Confidentiality Impact
PARTIAL
Integrity Impact
PARTIAL
Availability Impact
PARTIAL
Access Vector
NETWORK
Access Complexity
LOW
Authentication
SINGLE
Exploitability Score
8.0
Impact Score
6.4
CvssVersion
2.0

Exploit Intelligence

EPSS Score
60.68%
Probability of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS Percentile
99.1%
Percentile rank of EPSS score among Peer Group
As of 2026-07-26
Model: v2026.06.15
Metasploit: Tincd Post-Authentication Remote TCP Stack Buffer Overflow · Apr 22, 2013
ExploitDB: EDB-35441 · Dec 2, 2014
This CVE's current EPSS score of 0.6068 is in the 100th percentile among its peer group of 21,957 CVEs.

Social Chatter

No social media mentions found for this CVE.

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 Twitter, 0.0 Reddit, 0.1 Bluesky, 0.0 Mastodon, and 0.1 GitHub mentions.

Media Mentions

No media coverage found for this CVE.

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 InfoSec Media, 0.0 Vendor Blog, and 0.0 Security Researcher mentions.

Remediation

Remediation records are not available for this CVE.

References

freecode.com / projects/tinc/releases/354122
lists.fedoraproject.org / pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105531.html
lists.fedoraproject.org / pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105559.html
lists.fedoraproject.org / pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/106167.html
osvdb.org / 92653
secunia.com / advisories/53087
Vendor Advisory
secunia.com / advisories/53108
Vendor Advisory
github.com / gsliepen/tinc/commit/17a33dfd95b1a29e90db76414eb9622df9632320
debian.org / security/2013/dsa-2663
securityfocus.com / bid/59369
tinc-vpn.org / news
tinc-vpn.org / pipermail/tinc/2013-April/003240.html
Vendor Advisory