Predictive Vulnerability Intelligence.

Product

  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Company

  • About
  • Partnerships
  • Blog
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Data Licensing

© 2026 FAUCET Technologies LLC. All rights reserved.

CVE-2012-10018

37
FAUCET Score

CVE-2012-10018 describes a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Mapplic and Mapplic Lite WordPress plugins, affecting versions up to 6.1 and 1.0 respectively. This allows attackers to forge server-side requests, potentially leading to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack if an SVG file is requested. With a CVSS score of 8.3 (HIGH), the vulnerability is easily exploitable over the network with low complexity and no user interaction, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. While not listed in CISA's KEV catalog, Nuclei templates exist for authenticated stored XSS via SVG file upload, indicating public exploit code, though there is no evidence of active exploitation or significant community discussion.

Impacted Technologies

VendorProductVersion(s)CPE
<= 1.0CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:mapplic:mapplic:*:*:*:*:lite:wordpress:*:*
<= 6.1CPE matchmatch criteria
cpe:2.3:a:mapplic:mapplic:*:*:*:*:-:wordpress:*:*

CVSS Data

CVSS version used by this source: 3.1

8.3HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
CHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
LOW
Integrity Impact
LOW
Availability Impact
LOW
Exploitability Score
3.9
Impact Score
3.7
CvssVersion
3.1

Exploit Intelligence

EPSS Score
1.18%
Probability of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS Percentile
64.4%
Percentile rank of EPSS score among Peer Group
As of 2026-07-25
Model: v2026.06.15
Nuclei: CVE-2012-10018 · Dec 20, 2025
This CVE's current EPSS score of 0.0118 is in the 43rd percentile among its peer group of 51,466 CVEs.

Social Chatter

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.0 Twitter, 0.0 Reddit, 0.1 Bluesky, 0.1 Mastodon, and 0.4 GitHub mentions.

Media Mentions

No media coverage found for this CVE.

The average CVE in this peer group has 0.1 InfoSec Media, 0.0 Vendor Blog, and 0.0 Security Researcher mentions.

Remediation

Remediation records are not available for this CVE.

References

packetstormsecurity.com / files/161919
ExploitThird Party Advisory
packetstormsecurity.com / files/161920
ExploitThird Party Advisory
plugins.trac.wordpress.org / changeset/2503447
Patch
mapplic.com / docs
Release Notes
wordfence.com / threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5aacabb5-94af-485a-af24-e84db3e3726f
Third Party Advisory